Freitag, 1. April 2011

March review/ Year-Graph

March started with the $12 and ended with them. I didn´t played something else and, if you remember, I don´t wanted to play this much because of my A-Levels this month.

In the end it became my best month seen on the volume. Why?

Because I gave up playing in sets and started to play continuously. So I managed to get about 1,6k games.

But what are many games when you can´t get profit out of them. So the whole month I ran between 30-70 BI under EV. It ended with -40 BI under EV and -20 BI under 0.

With RB I managed to get about 10 BI+ this month. What a hourly...
But it seems so that I have to be happy that I didn´t loose money again in a month. Oh man.

I believe in variance and that all comes back finally so I´ll have to grind and grind...

The regs on the $12 are pretty bad, only about 5 really good ones with >10% ROI which is imo the highest longterm (5k+) but its possible.


I would love to play on stars again but for this I will have to move up because I don´t want to loose my Iron man (10+) which isn´t bad. But I don´t know if I will ever move up...but poker without new aims is really unmotivating...perhaps you have some thoughts about it?


Here the 2 Graphs:

March 2011 $12

Year 2011 ($12-$60; avg 21$, Full Tilt only)

4 Kommentare:

  1. do you have 18mans in your graph included?

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. no 18s this month, played only the $12 on Full Tilt.

    Don´t have enough BI for the 18s seen on the swings imo.

    AntwortenLöschen
  3. whats your average buyin during those first 1000 games this year? (graph Year 2011) sure there are no 18mans within those 1000games? cause that really messes up the EV.. cant believe how bad you were running :O GL

    AntwortenLöschen
  4. avg BI is ~25$ for the first 1k in the year 2011 graph.

    and no, there are no 18´s in it because on FT no one plays the 18s or 27 mans.

    and yes I know what is up with the EV on the 18s.

    and yes #2, I run a litte bad...disgusting

    AntwortenLöschen